Moses, Constantine and the Atenists

Let us narrow the focus of the current ‘Middle-East’ genii, by placing it squarely upon the crossroads onto which it first became manifest and seared into the collective’s psyche, otherwise it will only continue as confused and scattered pieces without hope of resolution. Once the correct root of the tree is observed, no doubt, it will elicit your hurled invectives in a more appropriate direction, that of Neo-Rome; headed up by the current Pope Ratzinger whose foundation is the hijacked Egyptian dying god psychodrama (Isis-Osiris). The same dictates issue from today’s religious and secular thrones as they did then, whose foundations continue in the same imperialist aspirations of Constantine; the Atenist; Sol Invictus. Having stated this, Israel today, is only Israel in name, whose sails only billow because they fill with those foul Neo-Roman winds.

Towards the end of the 18th Dynastic period of Akhenaten’s Egypt, Israel, traumatized from a self-inflicted wound, sought to sever itself from their Egyptian roots and heritage, distancing mind and body from the psychological trauma incurred from the event. This event is the ‘Scarlet Thread’, the dirty little secret that weaves throughout the ‘victors’ church history. This needs to be confronted, healed and reconciled with its neighboring Arab brothers and sisters.

According to Ahmed Osman’s well researched works all of the biblical patriarchs were Egyptian Pharaohs, from Tuthmosis III – aka David, down to Akhenaten/Moses. Their location of worship was centered on Heliopolis, the biblical city, Onn. Tutankhamun, born: Tutankhaten was the son of Akhenaten. From Tuthmosis III and Sahra (Abraham’s wife) issued Isaac, which is why Abraham desired to slay the child, it wasn’t his. But, the ‘lord’ Pharaoh Tuthmosis III stayed his hand with the promise of land and compensation sufficient to raise the child.

Osman’s impeccable comparative analysis of both early Egyptian /Jewish epic historical events and characters ties many, otherwise, incomprehensible threads logically and intuitively together. His research disperses much of the fog which currently guards the age-old myth, and like the grain of sand lodged within the flesh of an oyster, the dagger of light has become very much of a thorn to the myth’s  survival, for the myth is the steam-engine driving the world’s psyche upon which the current thrones sit. Since both thrones, secular and religious, are egocentric, they sit only to suit themselves.

All those who quest have a similar bond in that ALL cultures hold a piece to the puzzle. By aggregating the diffused narrative of separateness thereby restoring harmony; wars can not be waged without opponents and it is only the vain ego that, through deceit, seeks to rule by a force of arms and division. We are all chips from the same block. This is not the first iteration of ‘Zep Tepi’ – the first time, their have been countless others. As Graham Hancock states, “We are a civilization with amnesia.” But, there are those elements within the machinery of power that, for the benefit of self, wish to maintain that amnesia.

Moses by Michelangelo

Pharoah Moses

Akhenaten was a religious iconoclast of the highest order, tossing the old Egyptian religious establishment onto its head, resulting in violent upheaval. Akhenaten forbade the adoration of Osiris. There was no judgment of the dead before Osiris; instead, the king’s officials earned their life after death by following Akhenaten’s teachings and by being totally loyal to him during their lifetime. Akhenaten was the god who granted life. Akhenaten declared all other deities false and therefore he himself was the rightful focus of worship.

The dark sanctuary djeser-djeseru, the Holy of Holies, was gone; instead, there was a courtyard open to the sun and filled with small altars where Akhenaten alone represented humankind before the Aten.

Akhenaten/Moses with Nefertiti and Solar Disk

Narrow minded in his Atenist beliefs, Akhenaten’s growing fanaticism became vilified, and bitterly despised by those failing to accept his views. Retaining only the nomen (Moses) of the great house unto which he was born (Tuthmosis III), Akhenaten’s position became untenable as violence erupted against him. Forced to flee his throne, along with an entourage of followers; while settling in the Sinai region, his throne was passed to his son, Tutankhaten.

Tutankhaten, having perceived the error of his father, held out an olive branch in reconciliation to those his father’s myopic view had marginalized. In demonstration that his appeal was faithful, symbolically distancing himself from the narrow Atenist views, Tutankhaten changed his name from Aten (the sun disk) to Amun (the hidden). For this infraction, within the clutches of a raging fit, his fathers’ high priest, Phinehas (Pinhas; Panehasy), slew the boy king, according to Osman, at the foot o Sinai. Israel has never forgiven itself for this trauma that it had rained down upon itself. Instead, they fled, physically and psychologically severing all bridges behind them.

By this Sign Conquer

If only Constantine had not rubbed salt into the already distant and metastasized wound, exacerbating the trauma incurred with the slaying of Egypt’s Boy King, but appropriating the story and seeding it to pleasure his own narcissistic desire for empire instead, simply added insult to injury, which then gave rise to the vile religious predation and persecutions that ensued from new throne, it may not have manifest into the daemons we witness today. Constantine’s lust to consolidate power in this fashion, also inherited the trauma of the wound, plus the xenophobic myopia permeating the ranks of Moses’ followers, specifically the enclave of bickering Atenist’s dwelling amidst the Qumran caves.

Here De Molay Was Roasted

The Knights Templar, through many of their excursions into the Middle-East, mingling with the local Arab population, gained them knowledge that would later become the cause for their demise. Apart from an envious lust for the wealth amassed by the Templar’s, what the Roman throne feared most of all was the Templar’s pulling on the thread of Constantine’s myth, unraveling the throne’s entire cloak of deception. For what the Templar discovery revealed was that of the true character upon which Constantine had fabricated Rome’s dying god psychodrama was inherently related to the story of Tutankhamun’s death with that of the later arrival of  John the Baptist, who stood in Tutankhamun’s place as the redeeming savior.

Although Christianity was declared the official religion of the Roman Empire, Constantine persisted in having coins minted with his image bearing the inscription Sol Deus Invictus – the invincible sun-god. Following Constantine’s ascension to the Christian throne, his first order of the day was to have his own son executed. On his deathbed Constantine remained a true Atenist, ensconced in his epithet: Sol Invictus. Cloaked in a new garb, the inculcated chameleon staggers forward today with a rapacious appetite greater than before.

Heresy was the most expedient charge to levy against the ‘evil doers’ in that day as they too had become terrorists, enemies of the state; for which they were hunted down, tortured, burned and scattered. This same imperially devised illusion permeates the vast pool of the world’s collective psyche, upon which Constantine’s ship continues to sail forward.

What unfathomable sorrow the 2000 year old Roman wedge has wrought within the Middle-East, whose ill winds continue to fan out from its center; whose treachery and barbarous spilling of blood stains the pages of world history with bloody lies in homage to the god of war and a rule by force; stealing the crown from beyond the veil that would coronate all future kings and queens in its wake.

Those very same ill winds, now fill the lungs of a xenophobic fundamentalist movement within the ranks of the Christian right. This is the psychosis which permeates and drives the sails of the current neo-Roman legions; whose egos prowl the empire upon corporate fed metallic horses and sky-birds; the Atenist Constantine; salt in the wound of Akhenaten, whose myopia slew his son the boy king, Tutankhamun.

Where is Is-Ra-El – Isis, Ra and Elohim, in all of this?

Through a comfortably numb symbiosis, Israel, then and now, continues as a surrogate in the clutches of its Neo-Roman host; whose own ego has been stroked with the offer of a seat at the table of empire. Like a fly trapped within the spider’s web, the Roman psychodrama; fortified with layers of persecuted history, is manifest today in the reactionary forces as Zionism and presented in a candy wrapper of  fundamentalist Christianism; the hatchet of Constantine, buried in the history of Akhenaten. In this, Israel has become its own worst enemy, whose Medusa like image is not just the abhorrent reflection of their persecutors, but that which they themselves have become. Rome knows this and it will play the irritant tune upon the world’s violin strings with gusto, until all ears bleed.

To fully appreciate the psychology of forces currently at play, one must go back and test the preponderance of prevailing winds which propelled and breathe life into the Balfour Declaration. Much of the impetus for Zionism rode in on the back of delirious Christian inclinations both in England and America, seeking the prophetic return of their savior. Mantled in Constantine’s plagiarized dying god amalgamation, the delirious blind passion, thought it necessary to blast a chunk of dirt out of Palestine in order to expedite its occurrence, this was the real underlying thrust and motive which subconsciously fed the creation of the Israeli state and thus, Zionist aspirations.


500 years A.D. the temples were closed by order from the Roman emperor Flavius Anicius Justinianus. The priesthood was chased away and put in prison and the art of reading and writing hieroglyphs was forgotten forever.

The temple-complex functioned as the last bastion of the ancient Pharaonic religion in Egypt, until closed. The temple of Isis was later transformed into a Christian church.

In reference to the geometrically enumerated, irrational triad within the Supernal and the Temple that in old times was built on High: The holy place was made waste and the Sons of the house of Wisdom were taken away into the captivity of the senses.

All truly dogmatic religions have issued from the Jewish/Egyptian Qabalah and return to it: everything scientific and grand in the religious dreams is borrowed from the Qabalah; all the Adept associations owe to it their Secrets and their Symbols.

The Mystical Qabalah alone consecrates the alliance of the Universal Reason and the Divine Word; it establishes, by the counterpoises of two forces apparently opposite, the eternal balance of being; it alone reconciles Reason with Irrational, Power with Liberty, Science with Mystery; it has the keys of the Present, the Past, and the Future.

The Bible, with all the allegories it contains, expresses in an incomplete and veiled manner only, the religious science of the Hebrews. The doctrine of Moses/Akhenaten and the Prophets, identical at bottom with that of the ancient Egyptians, also had its outward meaning and its veils. The Hebrew books were written only to recall to memory the traditions; and they were written in Symbols unintelligible to the Profane. What occurred is that the external ‘symbol’, became the object of worship, rather than that which it was meant to ‘abstractly’ trigger internally.

Etymologically, the term Christ comes from the Greek Kristos; which in turn has its deeper Hebrew and Aramaic root: Mashih. The word is derived from the root MeSHeH, a verb meaning to anoint. Thus ‘the Christ’ indicated originally ‘the anointed one’ who is ‘the king’.

The basis of Messianic beliefs was the divine nature that Egyptians attributed to their kings, whose authority came from the divine principle beyond the veil. The king was not anointed with oil, but with the fat of a holy crocodile. This is the original source of the word ‘Messiah’. MeSSeH was the word for crocodile in Ancient Egypt, and the image of two crocodiles was used for the title of sovereign, bestowed on the king at the time of his coronation. Thus, there have been many anointed Kristos, or kings. Paulianity hijacked this.

Christianity should, in fact, have been labeled Paulianity. Paul was nothing more than a Roman proselytizer, sent out to smooth ruffled feathers and bolster the amalgamation which was later to be consolidated under the Atenist Constantine – Sol Invictus.

The Nazarenes were a radical sect, like the Essen’s; a disputing enclave of Atenists. The Semitic word is derived from the root nsr, which means to ‘guard’ or ‘protect’ and indicates ‘devotee’. The term has nothing to do with the town of Nazareth, which didn’t come into existence until late into the 1st century CE.

If your interested in pursuing this line of investigative study, I recommend starting with Osman’s ‘Stranger in the Valley of the Kings’ for the discovery here is pivotal to all else, followed by, ‘The House of the Messiah’.

It is the phenomenal world of the senses, seat of the ego; acting as blinders, which keep the veil to that higher self shut.

Gnothi Seauton

Relative Material:
Akhenaten – Moses

3 Responses to Moses, Constantine and the Atenists

  1. doro says:

    Please explain your knowlege of Constantine’s dying god psychodrama related to the story of Tutankhamun’s death and John the Baptist, who stood in Tutankhamun’s place as the redeeming savior. This is something I need to know more of…and haven’t been able to determine who John the Baptist really is….your analysis is great, but have you read NOT IN HIS IMAGE, by JOHN LAMB LASH?


    • amunaor says:

      Hi, Yes I’ve only recently ready Lash’s: Not In His Image. I certainly wish that I had latched onto it when it was first published in 2006. I did have a small contention with Lash, which I managed to iron out after a second reading. I’ve addressed that in my post: Gnostic Texts and Dead Sea Scrolls Reveal Christianity’s Roots in Radical Jewish Zaddikim Sect. Lash does bring a fascinating breath of fresh air to the table. Nowhere else is this kind of insight available. Christianity certainly is not what we’ve been lead to believe. As Lash points out, the Zaddikite sect, standing in the shadow of the mysterious character Melchizedek, took the names of historical figures, strangely transported them forward in time to play out new iterations of the same old movie. We see this attempt portrayed in ‘The Templar Revelation: Secret Guardians of the True Identity of Christ’ authors Lynn Picknett & Clive Prince, who argue that John the Baptist was to fill the shoes of new savior, but the the creators of the Christian religion had other ideas. I also suspect that maybe the Zaddikites were old, hard-line remnants of Atenists, generational waves, spawned in the wake of Akhenaten’s fleeing Egypt, washed into the caves of Qumran. But, because of what Saint Paul did, non of this really matters. The radical ideologies of Zaddikim live under the Christian tent, are its foundation. And the victors re-write the history.


  2. Interesting Posting. Hope to read more from you!


Leave a Reply to amunaor Cancel reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s